SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – IMPERISHABLE, IMMUTABLE, AND IMMORTAL PRINCIPLE OF LIVING THINGS
Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Qingmendous, extinct species, was part of a group of Lobe Finned Fishes .
Living Things are made up of 1. Living Matter, and 2. Physical Form. The Form or Morphological Appearance of Living Things is used in their identification and for classification.
Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Living Things Change Under Influence of Time. Changes of Growth and Development.
Theory of Evolution carefully records similarities between different living things and claims that living things are constantly changing and descend into new forms of living things that are again identified by their morphological appearance. Change is a Natural Phenomenon. Things in Nature change under influence of Time.
Protoplasm or Cytoplasm is the clear, soft, gelatinous living substance found inside all living cells. A most striking characteristic of Protoplasm is its vital property of Nutrition. Nutrition is the power which Protoplasm has of attracting to itself the materials that provide energy and are necessary for its growth and maintenance.
However, the problem of biodiversity is not resolved by Theory of Evolution. Living things change in appearance due to natural process called Growth and Development or due to aging process. Changes in Genetic Code called Mutation does not affect Chemical Composition of Living Matter while it may cause change in form or appearance.But any such observed change in appearance is possible if and only if Living Matter retains its basic chemical composition and behaves as if it is operated by Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle.
Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Chemical components of living cells such as Bacteria remains same unaffected by Mutations which may change Genetic Code.
All living things exist in nature by consuming other living things or consuming products made by other living things. All living things appear to be varied and yet consist of the same kind of Chemical Compounds. To a great extent, Chemical Elements retain their attributes as if they are imperishable, immutable, and can even said to be immortal. This unchanging nature or Spiritual attribute helps formulation of Fundamental Laws of Matter described by classical Physics and Chemistry. Over billions of years, Living Matter retained its basic Chemical Composition as Chemical Elements and Chemical Compounds governed or operated by imperishable, immutable, and immortal or Spiritual Principle not influenced by time or changes in climate, or other variable external conditions.
Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. The Organic Material called Protoplasm or Cytoplasm exhibits Nature that can neither be created nor destroyed. There is no ‘Evolutionary Change’.
The Organic Material called Protoplasm or Cytoplasm exhibits Nature that can neither be created nor destroyed. Its Nature is not subject to ‘Evolutionary Change’.
Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. This Ray Finned Fish shares the same characteristics found in all Living Things without significant variation in Chemical Components.
In my analysis, Theory of Evolution is fundamentally flawed for its focus on change in morphological appearance does not take into account Unchanging Nature of Chemical Elements and Chemical Compounds. There is no evolution for there is no natural factor, or natural mechanism, or natural condition that can violate Fundamental Laws of Nature.
Spirituality Science – Concept of Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) and Tree of Life.
Biological Diversity is reflected by the number of Living Animal and Plant species which are all operated by Unchanging Spiritual Principle. I explain Biological Diversity as a creative mechanism that formulates the morphological appearance of living things while they are essentially made up of the same Living Substance. Every living thing fundamentally exists as an Individual with Individuality. There are no two perfectly identical living things. For there is such vast diversity of living things, for purposes of convenience, they may be grouped and classified using principles shared by Taxonomy. Some Forms of Life became extinct over course of time but Life has not perished for Living Matter continues to exist as before. Indeed all varied Forms of Life are Formed by the same Chemical Components.
Rudra Narasimham Rebbapragada Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162 USA
THIS FUNNY-LOOKING ANCIENT FISH IS ACTUALLY YOUR GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT (YOU GET THE IDEA) GRAND-UNCLE.
By SARAH KAPLAN June 3
Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. This ancient, extinct form of fish called QINGMENDOUS may have lived with Living Matter made up of same Chemical Components as found in modern Lobe-Finned Fishes.
Qingmendous, a 409 million-year-old predatory fish provides unique insights into the early evolution of modern lobe-finned fishes. (Brian Choo/Flinders University)
MEET QINGMENDOUS
He’s half a foot long, 409 million years old and fierce as they come. Huge, squiggly teeth protrude from his lower lip, and powerful, muscle-bound fins allow him to sluice through the brackish water of a prehistoric lagoon. When he’s hungry, he lies in wait for creatures that are as much as half his size and ambushes them. His jagged teeth make quick work of the unsuspecting prey.
He’s also your great-great-great-great (you get the idea) grand-uncle. Pleased to make your acquaintance. Qingmendous, scientists report in the journal Science Advances on Friday, was part of a group of “lobe finned fishes” that included the first vertebrates to crawl onto land. Analysis of his skull will give researchers insight into how our distant fishy forebears evolved, they say, and a literal glimpse into the brain of a creature of that ancient world.
This prehistoric, predatory sea creature was first identified back in 2009, after paleontologists in China uncovered fossils of his hindquarters. Jing Lu and Min Zhu, both researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing and also lead authors on this report, identified Qingmendous as the oldest of a mysterious group of fish known as onychodonts.
Not much is known about the onychodonts, aside from the fact that they were predators with funny-looking faces (like Qingmendous, they all had squiggly teeth at the front of their lower jaw) and that they died out some 350 million years ago.
“We basically had two stages in the evolutionary history of the lobe finned fishes,” said You’an Zhu, a paleontologist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Uppsala University in Sweden. “There were the very primitive ones — so primitive they didn’t even have lobed fins,” he continued. “And then we get complete sets of lineages we are quite familiar with: coelacanths, also lungfish, and of course our direct ancestors the tetrapods (every land vertebrate ever, plus birds, bats, dolphins and whales).”
But few fossils have been found from the creatures that lived in between those two stages, and many aren’t in great shape. So it was hard to figure out how Qingmendous was related to other creatures alive at the time, not to mention everything that came after.
That’s when You’an Zhu joined the team. Using CT scans, he and his colleagues digitally reconstructed the inside of Qingmendous’s skull, allowing them to get a better look at who he was and how his brain worked. “It turned out to be a mosaic of characteristics,” he said. “It kind of filled in the gaps between the primitive and the modern lobe finned fishes, bridging the two stages together.”
Qingmendous is not a missing link, he said — evolution is not linear. But the characteristics of his body and brain can help explain how the sea creatures made the leap onto land. Like the ancestors of modern terrestrial creatures, Qingmendous dwelled in brackish waters of lagoons, bays and deltas — within spitting distance of land. He had the same muscular fins that his cousins would use to clamber gracelessly out of the water. His skull also shares some of the advanced features of still-living lobe finned fish (well, advanced for 409 million years ago), indicating that his brain was more modern as well.
The lobe finned fish had the right tools for terrestrial exploration. They also had good luck and good timing, You’an Zhu said. There are plenty of fish that can survive out of the water for short periods of time today, but they don’t stick around because there’s too much competition and too many predators.
But 390 million years ago, plants had comfortably colonized land and insects were widespread. The continents were essentially a well-stocked, all-you-can-eat buffet — with no one else to hog the food and not a single predator large enough to make you regret sticking your head out of the sea. “So the lobe finned fish will take their chance and venture onto land and become our ancestors,” he said.
Sarah Kaplan is a reporter for Speaking of Science. Follow @sarahkaplan48
Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Lobe-Finned Fish often called ‘Living Fossil’ remains Unchanged over millions of years.Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Extinct Form of Fish called COELACANTH. Some forms of life became extinct, but life has not perished for Living Matter continues to exist as before.Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Lobe-Finned Fish continues to live while some forms of Life became extinct during course of time.Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Lobe-Finned Fish belongs to Order Sarcopterygii. No distinction between Living Things can be made on the basis of their Chemical Components.Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Lungfish. While individual living things are born and die, Life continues without change in Chemical Components.Spirituality Science – Imperishable, Immutable, and Immortal Principle of Living Things. Extinct Form of Lobe-Finned Fish. Individual Living Things experience Birth and Death while Life continues as before with same Chemical Components.
MOLECULAR BASIS OF SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – IMMUNOLOGY PROVIDES UNDERSTANDING OF SELF AND NON-SELF. PROTEIN MOLECULES CALLED ANTIGENS ELICIT IMMUNE RESPONSE.
To account for human existence, to face challenges to human survival, man has to identify molecules that operate various living functions. Man defends his life deploying protein molecules that recognize and respond to invasion of human body by pathogens consisting of foreign protein molecules. While learned experience provides cortical awareness of human immunological responses to attacks by pathogens, human mind is blissfully unaware of presence of pathogens. Recognition of non-self proteins and molecules called antigens is not a mental function. If Spirit or Soul functions as guiding mechanism, Spirit or Soul will have awareness of invasion of body by foreign antigens and body’s immunological response to such invasion. If Reticular Formation of Brain Stem, the site at which contents of Consciousness are composed, is viewed as seat of human Spirit or Soul, it has awareness of body’s invasion and response to attacks by pathogens. Immunological responses to infections trigger a stress response mediated by Hypothalamus – Pituitary – Adrenal Cortex Pathway.
The discovery of antibiotic-resistant Superbugs may eventually lead to better understanding of Spirit or Soul in shaping human survival while warding off invasion by pathogens.
Rudra Narasimham Rebbapragada Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162 USA BHAVANAJAGAT.ORG
Behind the scenes of a U.S. superbug discovery that made headlines around the world
By LENA H. SUN June 6 at 5:43 PM
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Immunology provides the understanding of Self and Non-Self and the distinction demands recognition of Protein Molecules. Superbugs are antibiotic-resistant and pose challenge to human existence.
The Post’s Lena Sun visited Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Silver Spring, Md., where scientists identified a strain of bacteria resistant to the last-resort antibiotic, Colistin. The bacteria was found in a Pennsylvania woman. Microbiologist Patrick McGann explains how his team identified the gene that gives the bacteria this resistance (Monica Akhtar,Lena Sun/The Washington Post)
Microbiologist Patrick McGann knew he had identified a dangerous germ. He just didn’t know how dangerous. In mid-May, a colleague had found a strain of E. coli bacteria from a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman that tested positive for resistance to a drug called colistin. That’s the antibiotic used when all others fail.
McGann, whose job is to prevent outbreaks of new pathogens in the U.S. military’s sprawling health-care system, wasn’t yet alarmed. Sometimes mutations occur spontaneously that make bacteria resistant to an antibiotic. It would be a completely different problem, though, if the bacteria turned out to carry a certain colistin-resistant gene called mcr-1.
But that required deeper molecular testing. McGann asked his research team at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Silver Spring, Md., to do an initial test for the presence of the resistant gene. And on May 18, he got the result as he rode Metro’s Red Line back to the lab from a meeting.
Research technician Ana Ong texted him to say the strain of E. coli had tested positive for the mcr-1 gene. Stunned, McGann texted back: “You’re s—-ing me??” And then, realizing what the discovery meant, he didn’t wait for her reply. “Onto the sequencer ASAP,” he wrote back, referring to the labor-intensive, round-the-clock effort required to read the entire genetic code of the bacteria and determine how easily the gene might spread. “We had to drop everything else to get this done,” he explained later. “When [the test] came back positive, all hell broke loose.”
U.S. health officials and experts had been bracing for this moment since the gene’s discovery late last year in China. They’d hunted for mcr-1 in tens of thousands of samples from meat sources, animals and people.
And now that it’s definitively here, officials expect to find more cases — provoking even greater alarm. Immediately, the discovery in Pennsylvania gave new urgency to measures throughout the military and the federal government to determine where else the gene might be lurking and how to control its spread.
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Immunology demands studying Microbes at Molecular level to identify their pathogenicity.
Patrick McGann, left, and Kathy “Ana” Ong, prepare blood plates as their team at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research looks for evidence of a dangerous antibiotic-resistant gene in bacteria. (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post)
For infectious-disease experts, the nightmare scenario is for the gene to spread to bacteria that are now susceptible only to colistin. That would make them invincible to any antibiotic, unstoppable by the most lifesaving drugs of modern medicine.
‘This one popped up’
The gene mcr-1 was found first in pigs and people in China and then spread across Asia and Europe. By March, there were even more reports from France, Switzerland, Malaysia, Brazil and Argentina.
Still, the gene remains relatively rare. After the initial report from China, McGann’s team tested more than 3,000 antibiotic-resistant bacteria that had been collected from military facilities around the world. None contained the mcr-1 gene.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that drug-resistant bacteria cause 2 million illnesses and 23,000 deaths each year in the United States. Many service members wounded during the Iraq War contracted a strain of bacteria that the media later dubbed “Iraqibacter.” The normally harmless bacteria, found in soil and on skin, got into wounds and caused stubborn bloodstream infections, many of them resistant to many types of antibiotics. After about 2007, colistin was often one of the most effective treatment options available, McGann said.
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Study of Superbugs involves identification of genes responsible for antibiotic resistance. Genes are involved in synthesis of Protein Molecules.
Technician Brendan Corey watches a robotic micro lab prepare DNA samples for sequencing at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Maryland. (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post) That’s one reason the Army created the Multidrug-resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN) in 2009; McGann is its chief of molecular research and diagnostics. Researchers say the detection of colistin-resistant bacteria in the Pennsylvania woman was a result of this strong surveillance system — but also sheer luck.
McGann got the initial call about a resistant E. coli sample from Kurt Schaecher, chief of the infectious-diseases laboratory at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md. The hospital has the reference lab for about 100 military facilities, which regularly send it drug-resistant organisms.
Schaecher, who had just started in the job, was troubled by the number of reports coming in from around the world about the mcr-1 gene. Testing for colistin resistance was not routinely done in the lab, but he thought it would be prudent to start.
On May 12, he pulled out six of the lab’s most recent samples to test for resistance to colistin. The next day, the results were back. “And lo and behold, this one popped up,” he recalled, referring to the Pennsylvania sample.
He immediately alerted McGann. Both men were very surprised, Schaecher said. They didn’t know why the bacteria weren’t killed by colistin — it could have been a spontaneous mutation rather than the mcr-1 gene. McGann’s team went straight to Bethesda to collect the sample for more testing. Once McGann’s lab detected the gene on May 18, he alerted Schaecher and began fully sequencing the bacterium’s genome.
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Study of Superbugs involves identification of its genes that give ability to synthesize Protein Molecules that resist or overcome human body’s immune response or contribute to its drug resistance.
Rosslyn Maybank, left, and McGann work on tracing the mcr-1, antibiotic resistant gene. (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post)
‘A NEEDLE IN A STACK OF NEEDLES’‘
Sequencing would tell everyone where the gene was located. Was it on the bacterium’s single chromosome? Or in a much more troubling spot, on something called a plasmid, a mobile piece of DNA that exists outside the chromosome?
If the gene were on the chromosome, that wouldn’t be so bad. The bacterium could pass the resistance only to its progeny, limiting the spread. But finding the gene on the plasmid would be much, much worse. Plasmids can transfer their genes to other bacteria, McGann said, even strains that aren’t closely related. The technical term for this ability is “promiscuity.”
The sequencing process took several days. The researchers had to extract the DNA from the bacteria and set up the sequencing machines that would read the entire genome and determine not only what genes were in the organism, but also if there were plasmids and what kind.
By 9 p.m. on May 20, they were ready to proceed. They ran the same test on two machines. One sequencer is less accurate but takes about eight hours. The other, larger sequencer is more accurate but takes 72 hours. By the following day, early results confirmed that the gene was fully present and was most likely on a plasmid. Barely 24 hours later, another researcher had confirmed that the mcr-1 gene was present “on a promiscuous plasmid,” McGann said. The final verification took until May 23. “It was like finding a needle in a stack of needles in another stack of needles,” Schaecher recalled.
McGann likened plasmids to cars that can carry a gene and transport it to other bacteria. Some plasmids can transfer those genes more readily than others. “This one moved pretty well,” he said. “Not quite a Fiat, more like a BMW.”
Even as the patient was being treated — her bacteria, while resistant to colistin, were sensitive to other drugs — researchers began to notify colleagues in the Defense Department and other government agencies. They alerted the CDC as well as the Health and Human Services and Agriculture departments that a superbug capable of spreading colistin resistance far and wide had finally surfaced in a person in the United States.
Some officials have complained that they should have been informed sooner. McGann said it would have been imprudent to send an alert before results were completely confirmed. Around the same time, he, Schaecher and the research team submitted a paper about their findings to a medical journal. The editor, Yohei Doi, an infectious-disease doctor at the University of Pittsburgh, raced to get it reviewed.
The paper was published May 26, and the discovery made headlines around the world.
These are the top superbug threats in the U.S.
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Human body defends itself from attacks by pathogens deploying unique Protein Molecules called Antibodies. Superbugs synthesize Protein Molecules that can overcome body’s immune response. Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes infection called Gonorrhoea.
THE WHITE HOUSE HAS MADE THE GERMS ARE SERIOUS PRIORITY
Urgent threat. According to the White House plan to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriacea, CRE, is one of the country’s most urgent threats. Forty-four states have had at least one type of confirmed CREcase, which are resistant to nearly all antibiotics including last-resort drugs. CDC
Meanwhile, another surveillance system that includes the CDC, the USDA and the Food and Drug Administration has also been searching for the gene in bacteria collected from food animals, meat sources and people. Scientists have scoured more than 44,000 samples of salmonella bacteria and 9,000 samples of E. coli and Shigella bacteria.
That search is how the USDA scientists recently found the gene in a sample from a pig intestine. It also was in a strain of E. coli, and also on a plasmid. The USDA is working to determine the sample’s origin.
The strains and plasmids appear to be different, McGann said. That suggests that the gene is circulating through at least two — and possibly more — routes within the United States.
McGann said he learned about the mcr-1 gene in the pig sample only when his team notified government officials about its own finding. U.S. officials haven’t provided details about when the animal sample was found or why information about it wasn’t disclosed earlier.
Public health officials are most worried about the colistin-resistant gene spreading to a family of superbugs known as CRE, for carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae, which the CDC has called one of the country’s most urgent public health threats. In some instances, CRE kills up to 50 percent of patients who become infected. Colistin is increasingly the last-resort drug to treat patients with such infections.
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Superbug identification involves identification of its genome; the genes Superbug uses to synthesize its Protein Molecules involved either in pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance and its metabolic pathways.
McGann checks a DNA sampling before loading it into a genome sequencer. (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post)
Already, doctors have been forced to rely on colistin as a last-line defense for many drug-resistant infections. Colistin, more than half a century old, is otherwise rarely used in human medicine because it can cause severe kidney damage.
The drug is not used in animals in the United States, but in Europe it has been widely used in veterinary medicine for decades to treat and prevent infection. In May, the European Medicines Agency recommended limiting its use in animals to halt the spread of resistance. It’s also widely used in farm animals in China.
The Army’s MRSN system receives 400 to 500 samples of multidrug-resistant organisms each month, primarily from its facilities around the world. About half are MRSA, or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, bacteria resistant to many antibiotics that can cause a variety of problems, including skin infections and bloodstream infections. Another third are E. coli, and less than 1 percent are CRE.
The new information about the Pennsylvania woman’s colistin-resistant bacteria means McGann and his team can do more targeted searching in the repository of organisms. They’ve already scoured an additional 6,000 samples without again finding the gene.
This summer, all military services will be expected to begin providing the repository system with multidrug-resistant organisms. By contrast, the national antibiotic resistance surveillance system that the CDC, USDA and FDA operate collectively serves all civilian hospitals in the country. It covers a far larger patient population and collects thousands of pathogen samples for each of the 15 antibiotic-resistant bacteria that the CDC has deemed to be urgent or serious threats.
Until now, the resistance testing has taken place at the CDC. But late last year, Congress approved $160 million in additional funding to boost the Obama administration’s antibiotic-resistance detection efforts. As a result, the agency plans to start funding state health departments this fall to do improved testing for antimicrobial resistance. That will include colistin.
Lena H. Sun is a national reporter for The Washington Post, focusing on health.
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Cells of the Immune System recognize foreign protein molecules called Antigens and respond to their presence.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Reticular Formation of Brain Stem and Consciousness.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Stress and Immune System. Body recognizes threat posed by foreign protein molecules or antigens that elicit immune response.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Recognition of foreign protein molecules or antigens is not a mental function. However, Reticular Formation is involved in shaping Immune Response to Stress imposed by pathogens attacking human body.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria pose danger because of their ability to synthesize Protein Molecules.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Superbugs such as Staphylococcus. aureus (MRSA) pose danger because of their ability to synthesize Protein Molecules.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Recognition of Protein Molecules plays a central role in defending body from attacks by Pathogens.
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Body’s Defense against invasion by pathogens requires recognition of protein molecules involved in virulence and drug resistance. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Defense against Superbugs demands knowing Molecular Basis of Life. Escherichia coli.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Infection and Immune Response involve understanding Protein Molecules that operate living functions.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Immunology provides understanding of Life at Molecular Level. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Dangers posed by Superbugs will lead to better understanding of Molecules that defend Life and Molecules causing Disease.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Superbugs pose danger and burden on account of drug resistance which involves deployment of Protein Molecules.Molecular Basis of Spirituality Science. Defending Life against dangers posed by Superbugs involves recognition of their Protein Molecules.
SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE – OPERATION EAGLE – PETITION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.On bhavanajagat.com
The Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances, Government of India informed me that the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Defence rejected my petition on May 31, 2016. The notification simply mentions, “Case Closed.” Apparently, this decision is not made by the Indian Army Chief of Army Staff or the Prime Minister of India.
Rudra Narasimham Rebbapragada Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162 USA SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE
:: Grievance Status ::
Centralized Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System(CPGRAMS) Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances Government of India
Grievance Status Status as on 05 Jun 2016 Registration Number: DARPG/E/2013/82606 Name Of Complainant: R R Narasimham
Date of Receipt: 07 Sep 2013
Received by: Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances
Forwarded to : D Ceremonials
Contact Address: Room No. 363V B South Block, New Delhi, 110011. Contact Number: 23011872 Grievance Description:
Dear Sir, or Madam,
This grievance pertains to the following petitions registered by the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances. 1. MODEF/E/2011/00761 dated 24 Sep 2011, 2. CABST/E/2012/00154 dated 26 May 2012, 3. DARPG/E/2013/82597 dated 07 Sep 2013, and 4. MODEF/E/2013/01709 dated 05 Sep 2013.
A gallantry award is granted in recognition of a past event and the gallant action would always exist as a past event.
2. In the history of the Republic of India, for the first time during 1971, the Prime Minister sanctioned a military action that was not planned by Army/Ministry of Defence.
3. Operation Eagle in which I had the honor to participate was not planned and executed under orders issued by Army Headquarters/Ministry of Defence.
4. The gallant action did not happen in the context of a border skirmish or that of a border conflict. It was not related to the Official War between India and Pakistan that was declared by the Prime Minister on 04 December 1971.
5. The gallant action pertains to a deliberate, planned attack deep inside the territory defended by the Enemy’s Regular Army. I had marched with the men to participate in the attack.
6. The battlefield casualties were treated at the Enemy Post we captured and not in Indian territory. This was a special operation which did not cater for a Regimental Aid Post and a Advanced Dressing Station to provide medical care and support in the field.
7. There was no Regimental Aid Post at the border, inside Indian territory. The treatment of battle casualties began at the site of the battle, about 40 miles from the border.
8. The Brigade Headquarters which had the primary responsibility for airlifting of battle casualties could not dispatch the helicopter as the Prime Minister did not sanction the violation of Pakistan’s airspace during the first phase of Operation Eagle in the month of November 1971.
9. I, as the Unit Medical Officer, went beyond the call of my duty to ensure a safe evacuation of the battlefield casualties. To get the airlift support to evacuate my casualties to the Field Hospital, I marched a distance of over 40 miles to reach the Border Security Force helipad. Then I walked back to my Unit to complete my task inside the Enemy territory while the Enemy was still dispersed in the area.
10. The Indian Army concluded its phase of military operations inside Bangladesh on 16 December 1971 when the Enemy totally surrendered. However, Operation Eagle concluded its military operation during January 1972.
11. The fact that the Prime Minister established the eligibility criteria for the sanction of military awards, honors and decorations to the participants of Operation Eagle could be proved by the simple fact that the Gallantry Award of Vir Chakra was given to Shri. G B Velankar, a civilian officer of my Unit who was allowed the use of Major’s rank on an honorary basis.
12. Under the battle plan of Operation Eagle, to grant military awards, the Prime Minister did not impose any time constraints as it was not a battle operation launched by the Indian Army.
13. The citation that recommended the grant of Vir Chakra for my gallant action during Operation Eagle was initiated by Lieutenant Colonel B K Narayan, the South Column Unit Commander, it was reviewed and recommended by Brigade Commander, Brigadier T S Oberoi VrC, and it was finally approved and recommended by the Formation Commander, Major General Sujan Singh Uban, the Inspector General, Special Frontier Force.
14. Special Frontier Force had strictly followed the guidelines included in the battle plan of Operation Eagle and the citation was directly submitted to the Director of Medical Services (Army), Medical Directorate, Army Headquarters, New Delhi before the conclusion of Operation Eagle.
15. I am not responsible for delivering the citation to the MS Branch, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi while I am on operational duty in the field. If the Medical Directorate had failed in the performance of its duty, I should not be penalized.
Current Status: CASE CLOSED
Date of Action: 31 May 2016
Details: Appropriate reply has been sent to the complainant. Maybe closed.
Designed, Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre
Special Frontier Force – Operation Eagle – Petition to Government of India.Special Frontier Force – Operation Eagle – Petition to Government of India.On bhavanajagat.wordpress.comSpecial Frontier Force – Operation Eagle – Petition to Government of India.On bhavanajagat.wordpress.comSpecial Frontier Force – Operation Eagle – Petition to Government of India.On bhavanajagat.comThis letter sent from Office of Inspector General Special Frontier Force to the Military Secretary’s Branch contains written evidence about the citattion initiated by Lieutnant Colonel B K Narayan, Commander South Column Unit, Operation Eagle.A Personal Tribute to Colonel B K Narayan, The Regiment of Artillery, Indian Army.
A Sermon in Kaptai, Bangladesh Ops 1971-72. A personal tribute to Colonel B K Narayan, Islamic Scholar who served in Olive Green Uniform. The Imam of Friday Prayer in Kaptai on December 17, 1971: Glorious Quran, Surah VIII, SPOILS OF WAR, Verse 01: “And if they incline to peace, incline thou also to it, and trust in Allah.Lo! He is the Hearer, the Knower.”SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE – THE OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT: GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CANNOT IMPOSE THE RULES OF THE OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT AND DEMAND THAT I SHOULD NOT SHARE INFORMATION ABOUT SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE, THE MILITARY ORGANIZATION IN WHICH I HAD SERVED UNDER THE COMMAND OF BRIGADIER T S OBEROI WHO GOT PROMOTED TO THE RANK OF MAJOR GENERAL AND SERVED AS THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE.Service Number IC. 22805 Major Survendra Singh Negi, the Company Commander of South Column, Operation Eagle is my witness.Service Number IC-22805 Major Survender Singh Negi, The Grenadiers was one of my Company Commanders during the military action code named Operation Eagle.Flight Lieutenant Parvez Rustom Jamasji Vrc Helicopter Pilot Operation Eagle, Bangladesh Ops, The Chittagong Hill Tracts.Flt Lt Parvez Rustom Jamasji, Indian Air Force Helicopter Pilot who provided airlift to the battle casualties of Operation Eagle, The Chittagong Hill Tracts.JANUARY 10, 1972. I WAS ON OPERATIONAL DUTY AT KAPTAI, THE CHITTAGONG HILL TRACTS, BANGLADESH. Special Frontier Force – Operation Eagle – Petition to Government of India. On wholedude.comOn January 10, 1972, I was still performing operational duties at Kaptai, The Chittagong Hill Tracts while Bangladesh leader Sheik Mujibur Rehman returned to Dhaka from his captivity in West Pakistan. Special Frontier Force – Operation Eagle – Petition to Government of India.On wholedude.comTE3N Movie – Indian Army vs Special Frontier Force. In 1971, Special Frontier Force initiated Liberation of Bangladesh with military action in Chittagong Hill Tracts with Battle Plan Code-named Operation Eagle. This Operation is not governed by Army Act 1950.
Reports indicate that death rate for Americans has increased reversing long-term trend of declining mortality rate. Some of the contributing factors for higher mortality rate are mentioned as drug overdose, firearm injuries, and suicide. The problem of premature death, or death due to all conditions has to be explained in the context of sickness or injury leading to loss of life. The primary concern is that of man’s health and well-being.
To define health and well-being, man has to be known in all his dimensions; 1.Physical, Mortal Being, 2. Mental Being, 3. Social Being, 4. Moral Being, 5. Spiritual Being, and 6. Created Being. Man’s sickness or injury, factors involved in mortality have to be associated with man’s dimension that is at risk under the influence of given mortality factor. It demands recognition of symptoms of physical sickness, mental sickness, social sickness, moral sickness, spiritual sickness, and inherited sickness. If man is created in God’s own image without sickness, how did man inherit sickness that causes death or mortality?
Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162 USA BHAVANAJAGAT.ORG
THE WASHINGTON POST
REVERSING LONG-TERM TREND, DEATH RATE FOR AMERICANS TICKS UPWARD
By JOEL ACHENBACH June 1
A heroin user prepares to inject himself in New London, Conn. Communities nationwide are struggling with an unprecedented epidemic of opioid and heroin overdose deaths, which are contributing to a sudden increase in Americans’ overall mortality rate. (John Moore/Getty Images)
The long decline in Americans’ death rates has reversed course, according to preliminary 2015 numbers for all causes of mortality as compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Many factors are implicated in the turnaround, including a rise in deaths from firearms, drug overdoses, accidental injuries, suicides, Alzheimer’s disease, hypertension and stroke.
In a report released Wednesday, the CDC looked at changes in death rates per 100,000 people between 2014 and 2015, adjusting the findings to reflect an aging population as the baby boomers head into their retirement years.
The agency identified gains on the cancer front: The disease is killing Americans at a lower rate. But that medical progress was overtaken by the other factors. Lethal drug overdoses, for example, rose from 14.0 per 100,000 people in early 2014 to 15.2 by mid-2015. And even though heart disease was basically flat, that was a change from the major killer’s years-long decline — a decrease that had helped drive down the overall mortality rate.
Whether the uptick in the death rate is a statistical fluke is unclear. The CDC will have final numbers in December, and one year does not make a trend. But the report echoes other recent research suggesting that these days the American way of life is too often leading to an early death.
“There’s no smoking gun here,” said Farida Ahmad, mortality surveillance lead for the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. She calls the increase in mortality “unusual,” noting that it’s the first time since 2004-2005 that the rate went up rather than down.
“It’s something that we’re going to be looking into and watching to see if it holds for 2016. It could be that it’s just a blip as it was 10 years ago,” she said.
The historical trend in health and mortality has largely been a story of medical triumphs and longer lives. For example, in 1950, when rates of infant mortality were much higher than today, the death rate per 100,000 Americans was 1,446. By 2014 the rate had fallen to exactly half that — 723. But the preliminary 2015 numbers show a bump up to 729.5.
Numerous researchers have been focusing on the sharp and unanticipated rise in mortality among whites, particularly white women, in their midlife years. The Washington Post’s own analysis of the nation’s death rates indicates that this increase is pronounced in small cities, small towns and the most rural areas.
This latest report does not break down deaths by sex, race, geography or other demographic indicators.
“When we’re spending $3 trillion in health care, and we’re seeing mortality rise — even if this is only a momentary rise — we need to examine what we’re doing and how we’re doing it,” said Ellen Meara, professor of health policy and clinical practice at Dartmouth College. “Clearly we’re doing something wrong.”
Joel Achenbach covers science and politics for the National Desk. Achenbach also helms the “Achenblog.”
Follow @joelachenbach
BHARAT DARSHAN – STATUS OF TAJ MAHAL AS AN INDIAN ICON. ELABORATE FUNERARY MONUMENTS ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF INDIAN CULTURE.BHARAT DARSHAN – STATUS OF TAJ MAHAL AS AN INDIAN ICON. THE CONCEPTION OF TAJ MAHAL AS FUNERARY MONUMENT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH FOUNDATIONAL VALUES OF INDIAN CIVILIZATION.
Taj Mahal, most ornate mausoleum in the world, is viewed by millions of people for it stands out as beautiful, romantic building. It stands in a walled garden with an oblong reflective pool. The white marble exterior is inlaid with semi precious stones, floral designs, and arabesques. The dome, 80 feet high and 50 feet in diameter inside, forms a bulb outside, tapering to a spike topped by a crescent. The building has meticulous symmetry across its long and wide diameters.The octagonal tomb chamber is lit by light passing through intricately carved screens. However, the grave site is not perfectly symmetrical. Mumtaz Mahal’s casket is in the exact center of the Palace crypt. Emperor Shah Jahan’s grave, introduced to the mausoleum following his death in 1666, has a west-of-center resting place.
The story about Taj Mahal construction has been firmly associated with life story of Emperor Shah Jahan’s third wife Arjumand Banu Begum. She acquired the name ‘MUMTAZ’ for she was the ‘Chosen One of the Palace’. She was married for 19 years and led to the birth of 14 children. She died in 1631 at the age of 39 during the birth of her final child. Construction of mausoleum began in 1632, one year after her death. Construction of main building continued for 18 years and the entire complex, immediate adjuncts such as Mosque, wall, and Gateway, took another four years for completion. In development of Taj Mahal complex nearly one thousand elephants handled the transport of heavy building materials. The two-decade construction project may have involved over 20,000 artisans. Credit of designing the building complex is given to Turkish Architect Ustad Ahmad Lahauri. Much of the intricate calligraphy work was done by Abd-al Haqq known as Amanat Khan Shirazi. French explorer Jean-Baptiste Tavernier visited India and Taj Mahal in 1665.
Shah Jahan (1529 – 1666), Mogul Emperor (1592 – 1658), nine years before his death, fell gravely ill which led to his sons fighting over succession. His two sons with Mumtaz Mahal, Dara Shikoh and Aurangzeb had begun fighting. Shah Jahan sided with his elder son Dara but his younger son Aurangzeb emerged victorious, killing Dara and imprisoning father in Agra Fort. Shah Jahan remained imprisoned and was barred from visiting Taj Mahal which was completed by about 1649 around the same time he fell ill.
Indian historian P.N. Oak and sociologist Amarnath Mishra raised several issues about the status of Taj Mahal as an Indian icon. The architectural Truth of Taj Mahal has yet to be revealed. I am pleased to share view of Professor Marvin H. Mills, American architect, Pratt Institute, New York.
Taj Mahal as a funerary monument is not representative of Indian Civilization. However, the building material such as marble stone represents India, apart from elephants which lifted these stones, thousands of artisans who carved these stones, and the site along River Jamuna or Yamuna definitely impart Indian flavor to this Mahal or Palace where two human beings remain buried.
Rudra Narasimham Rebbapragada Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162 USA BHAVANAJAGAT.ORG
by Professor Marvin H. Mills Pratt Institute, New York
In their book TAJ MAHAL – THE ILLUMINED TOMB, Wayne Edison Begley and Ziyaud-Din Ahmad Desai have put together a very commendable body of data and information derived from contemporary sources and augmented with numerous photo illustrations, chroniclers’ descriptions, imperial directives plus letters, plans, elevations and diagrams. They have performed a valuable service to the community of scholars and laymen concerned with the circumstances surrounding the origin and development of the Taj Mahal.
But these positive contributions exist within a framework of analysis and interpretation that distorts a potential source of enlightenment into support for fantasy and misinformation that has plagued scholarship in this field for hundreds of years, thus obscuring the true origin of the Taj Mahal complex. The two basic procedural errors that they make is to assume that the dated inscriptions are accurate and that court chroniclers are behaving like objective historians.
As an architect, my principal argument with the authors is their facile acceptance of the compact time frame that they uncritically accept for the coming into being of the Taj from conception to its first Urs (anniversary) of the death of Mumtaz and the completion of the main building. Construction processes that had to consume substantial blocks of time are condensed into a few months. They feel justified in relying on what evidence is available, but fail to consider the objective needs of construction. They regret the loss of what, they say, must have been millions of Mughal state records and documents produced each year on all aspects of the Taj’s construction. They do not consider that the lack of drawings, specifications and records of payment may be due to their not being generated at the time. Nor do they consider Shah Jahan’s potential for deception as to when and by whom it was built. Yet they point out Shah Jahan’s careful monitoring of the contents of court history:
“Shah Jahan himself was probably responsible for this twisting of historical truth. The truth would have shown him to be inconsistent and this could not be tolerated. For this reason also, the histories contain no statements of any kind that are critical of the Emperor or his policies, and even military defeats are rationalized so that no blame could be attached to him. … effusive praise of the Emperor is carried to such extremes that he seems more a divinity than a mortal man.” (p. xxvi)
With the court chroniclers’ histories carefully edited, and with the great scarcity of documents we are fortunate to have four surviving farmans or directives issued by Shah Jahan to Raja Jai Singh of Amber-the very same local ruler from whom the Emperor acquired the Taj property. On the basis of these farmans, the court chroniclers and a visiting European traveler, we learn that: (i) Mumtaz died and was buried temporarily at Burhanpur on June 17, 1631; (ii) her body was exhumed and taken to Agra on December 11, 1631; (iii) she was reburied somewhere on the Taj grounds on January 8, 1632; and (iv) European traveler Peter Mundy witnessed Shah Jahan’s return to Agra with his cavalcade on June 11, 1632.
The first farman was issued on September 20, 1632 in which the Emperor urges Raja Jai Singh to hasten the shipment of marble for the facing of the interior walls of the mausoleum, i.e., the Taj main building. Naturally a building had to be there to receive the finish. How much time was needed to put that basic building in place?
Every successful new building construction follows what we call in modern-day construction a “critical path”. There is a normal sequence of steps requiring a minimum time before other processes follow. Since Mumtaz died unexpectedly and relatively young (having survived thirteen previous child-births), we can assume that Shah Jahan was unprepared for her sudden demise. He had to conceive, in the midst of his trauma, of a world-class tomb dedicated to her, select an architect (whose identity is still debated), work out a design program with the architect, and have the architect prepare designs, engineer the structure and mechanical systems, detail the drawings, organize the contractors and thousands of workers, and prepare a complex construction schedule. Mysteriously, no documents relating to this elaborate procedure, other than the four farmans have survived.
We cannot assume that the Taj complex was built additively with the buildings and landscaping built as needed. It was designed as a unified whole. Begley and Desai make this clear by their analysis of the grid system that was employed by the designer to unite the complex horizontally and vertically to into a three-dimensional whole. If one did not “know” that it was a solemn burial grounds, one would believe that it was designed as a palace with a delightful air of fantasy and secular delights of waterways and flowering plants. Could it be that this is Raja Jai Singh’s palace, never destroyed, converted by decree and some minimum face-lifting to a Mughal tomb?
Assuming that Shah Jahan was galvanized into prompt action to initiate the project on behalf of his deceased beloved, we can safely assume that he needed one year minimum between conception and ground-breaking. Since Mumtaz died in June 1631, that would take us to June 1632. But construction is said to have begun in January 1632.
Excavation must have presented a formidable task. First, the demolition of Raja Jai Singh’s palace would have had to occur. We know that the property had a palace on it from the chronicles of Mirza Qazini and Abd al-Hamid Lahori. Lahori writes:
“As there was a tract of land (zamini) of great eminence and pleasantness towards the south of that large city, on which before there was this mansion (manzil) of Raja Man Singh, and which now belongs to his grandson Raja Jai Singh, it was selected for the burial place (madfan) of that tenant of paradise.[Mumtaz]” (p. 43)
Measures would have to be taken during excavation of this main building and the other buildings to the north to retain the Jumna River from inundating the excavation. The next steps would have been to sink the massive foundation piers, put in the footings, retaining the walls and the plinth or podium to support the Taj and its two accompanying buildings to the east and west plus the foundations for the corner towers, the well house, the underground rooms, and assuming the complex was done at one time, all the supports for the remainder of the buildings throughout the complex. To be conservative in our estimate, we need at least another year of construction which takes us up to January 1634.
But here is the problem. On the anniversary of the death of Mumtaz, each year Shah Jahan would stage the Urs celebration at the Taj. The first Urs occurred on June 22, 1632. Though construction had allegedly begun only six months earlier, the great plinth of red sandstone over brick, 374 yards long, 140 yards wide, and 14 yards high was already in place! Even Begley and Desai are somewhat amazed.
Where was all the construction debris, the piles of materials, the marble, the brick scaffolding, the temporary housing for thousands of workers, the numerous animals needed to haul materials? If “heaven was surpassed by the magnificence of the rituals”, as one chronicler puts it, then nothing should have been visible to mar the exquisite panorama that the occasion called for.
But by June 1632, it was not physically possible that construction could have progressed to completion of excavation, construction of all the footings and foundations, completion of the immense platform and clearing of all the debris and eyesores in preparation for the first Urs.
Begley and Desai have little use for the testimony of the European travelers to the court of Shah Jahan. But they consider Peter Mundy, an agent of the British East India Company, to be the most important source on the Taj because he was there shortly before the first Urs at the new grave site, and one year later at the second Urs.
It was Mundy who said that he saw the installation of the enameled gold railing surrounding Mumtaz’s cenotaph at the time of the second Urs on May 26, 1633. But there is no way that construction could have moved ahead so vigorously from January 1632 to May 1633 as to be ready to receive the railing. After all, the railing could not have stood forth in the open air. It means that the Taj building had to be already there. It must have been immensely valuable since the cost of the Taj complex was reported to be fifty lakhs, while the cost of the gold railing was six lakhs of rupees. The gold railing was removed by Shah Jahan on February 6, 1643 when it was replaced by the inlaid white marble screen one sees now.
An alternate interpretation of events regarding the railing is that Shah Jahan revealed the gold railing of Raja Jai Singh at the first or second Urs. In 1643 he appropriated it for himself and put in its place the very fine marble screen with its inlaid semi-precious stones, a screen that was not nearly as valuable as the gold railing.
If Shah Jahan’s construction and interior adornment of the Taj are in question, what rework of the Taj can we attribute to him? The inscriptions were undoubtedly among the few rework tasks that he was obliged to do. He may also have removed any obvious references to Hinduism in the form of symbolic decor that existed.
The book’s plate illustrations show that the inscriptions are almost always in a discrete rectangular frame which renders them capable of being modified or added to without damaging the adjacent material. In my judgement the black script on the white marble background seems inappropriate esthetically in the midst of the soft beige marble that surrounds it. By adding the inscriptions Shah Jahan probably sought to establish the credibility of its having been his creation as a sacred mausoleum instead of the Hindu palace that time will undoubtedly prove that it was.
Based on the latest inscriptions dated 1638-39, which appear on the tomb, the authors estimate a construction period of six years. Six years in my judgement is simply not enough time. As reasonable approximation of the total time required to build the Taj complex, we can consider Tavernier’s estimate of twenty-two years. Although he first arrived in Agra in 1640, he probably witnessed some rework or repair. The time frame of twenty-two years may have been passed on to him by local people as part of the collective memory from some previous century when the Taj was actually built.
The issue of repairs is taken up by the authors in their translation of the original letter of Aurangzeb to his father dated December 9, 1652. He reports serious leaks on the north side, the four arched portals, the four small domes, the four northern vestibules, subchambers of the plinth, plus leaks from the previous rainy season. The question the authors do not raise is: Would the Taj, being at most only thirteen years old, already have shown symptoms of decay? Wouldn’t it be more reasonable to believe that by 1652 it was already hundreds of years old and was showing normal wear and tear.
Who built the Taj? The authors say it was Ahmad Ustad Lahori, chief architect for Shah Jahan. They base this belief mainly on the assertion by Luft Allah, the son of Lahori, in a collection of verses, that Shah Jahan commanded Lahori to build both the Taj and the Red Fort at Delhi. As evidence this is quite weak.
The court historians are unfailing in their praise for the Emperor’s personal participation in his massive architectural projects and they are never lacking in glorifying his sterling character. But the European travelers have other things to say about his personality and his inability to focus on anything for long except his lust for women. Nor is the object of his supposed great love either tender or compassionate. It seems that both “lovers” were cruel, self-centered and vicious. To believe that out of this relationship, with the support of Shah Jahan’s alleged great architectural skills, came what many consider to be the most beautiful building complex in the world, is sheer romantic nonsense.
While Begley and Desai are sceptical of the Taj Mahal’s being a consequence of romantic devotion, they yield not an inch in asserting its Mughal origin. They support this traditional view by overlooking some key problems:
1. Consider the identical character of the two buildings on either side of the Taj main building. If they had different functions-one a mosque, the other a guest residence-then, they should have been designed differently to reflect their individual functions.
2. Why does the perimeter wall of the complex have a Medieval, pre-artillery, defense character when artillery (cannons) was already in use in the Mughal invasions of India? [Why does a mausoleum need a protective wall in the first place? For a palace it is understandable.]
3. Why are there some twenty rooms below the terrace level on the north side of the Taj facing the Jumna River? Why does a mausoleum need these rooms? A palace could put them to good use. The authors do not even mention their existence.
4. What is in the sealed-up rooms on the south side of the long corridor opposite the twenty contiguous rooms? Who filled in the doorway with masonry? Why are scholars not allowed to enter and study whatever objects or decor are within?
5. Why does the “mosque” face due west instead of facing Mecca? Certainly, by the seventeenth century there was no problem in orienting a building precisely!
6. Why has the Archaeological Survey of India blocked any dating of the Taj by means of Carbon-14 or thermoluminescence? Any controversy over which century the Taj was built could easily be resolved. [Radiocarbon dating of a piece of wood surreptitiously taken from one of the doors gave 13th century as a possible date. But more data is needed.]
If Shah Jahan did not build the Taj for the love of Mumtaz, then why did he want it? His love for Mumtaz was evidently a convenient subterfuge. He actually wanted the existing palace for himself. He appropriated it from Raja Jai Singh by making him an offer he could not refuse, the gift of other properties in exchange. He also acquired whatever was precious within the building including the immensely valuable gold railing.
By converting the complex into a sacred Moslem mausoleum he insured that the Hindus would never want it back. Shah Jahan converted the residential quarters to the west of the main building to a mosque simply by modifying the interior of the west wall to create a mihrab niche. He added Islamic inscriptions around many doorways and entries to give the impression that the Taj had always been Islamic. Sure enough, the scholars have been silent or deceived ever since.
Yet, we must thank Begley and Desai for having assembled so much useful data and translated contemporary writings and inscriptions. Where they failed is in accepting an apocryphal legend of the Taj for an absolute fact. Their interpretations and analyses have been forced into the mold of their bias. It would be well to take advantage of their work by scholars and laymen interested in deepening their knowledge of the Taj Mahal to read the book while keeping an open mind as to when and by whom it was built.
Added note:
A leading Indian architect, former professor of architecture at Mysore University adds: There are fundamental problems with the current theory of Islamic Architecture in India of which the following may be noted.
(1) Unlike in the case of Hindu architecture, where there are literally hundreds of works on Vastu in several Indian languages, there seem to be almost no texts or manuals on Islamic architecture. It is difficult to see how a great school of architecture lasting 600 years could flourish without any technical literature.
(2) Hindu architectural practices and traditions are maintained by thousands of mason families, especially in South India. These are known as Vishwakarmas or Vishwa Brahmanas. They are greatly in demand all over the world. No such Muslim families are known.
(3) There are no standards of units and measurements for Islamic architecture in India. It is inconceivable that great works of architecture could come up without them. This is an objective requirement.
TAJ MAHAL – The Illumined Tomb, an anthology of seventeenth century Mughal and European documentary sources, by W.E. Begley and Z.A. Desai: Published by the University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, 1989 (The Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture).
The reviewer Marvin Mills is a leading New York architect and professor of architecture at the Pratt Institute.
Ever since P N Oak wrote the books ( it ran into four editions) proving that the Taj Mahal was an erstwhile Rajput Palace commandeered as a Mongol Tomb public opinion is now slowly but surely accepting his findings.
Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Funerary Monuments are not representative of Indian Culture and Civilization.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Indians have not erected grand funerary monuments.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Funerary Monuments are not representative of Indian Culture and Civilization.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Funerary Monuments do not represent Indian Culture and Civilization.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Funerary Monuments are not representative of Indian Culture and Civilization.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. What is the architectural Truth?Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. If a building is defined by its purpose, funerary monuments serve no purpose in Indian Culture and Civilization.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. In Islamic architecture, Mosque faces North or towards Mecca.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. In Indian Culture and Civilization, buildings,palaces, and temples have specific functions and parts are aligned to represent cultural values.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Taj Mahal appears as a funerary monument but has several rooms whose purpose and function remains unknown.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. What is its Architectural Truth?Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Adding inscriptions to buildings may conceal Architectural Truth.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. This Marble Screen replaced a Golden railing.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Indians do not bury their dead in their buildings, palaces, or temples. If the building includes living rooms, it may not be a funerary monument to begin with.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon. Writings of Mulla Abdul Hamid Lahori. Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan – Status of Taj Mahal as Indian Icon.Bharat Darshan. The Status of Taj Mahal as an Indian Icon.
A Tribute to Fallen Soldiers of the US-India-Tibet Military Organization
A Tribute to Fallen Soldiers of the US-India-Tibet Military Organization
On Memorial Day, United States honors its citizens who have died in War. Originally commemorating soldiers killed in the American Civil War, the observance was later extended to all US war dead. The holiday is observed on the last Monday in the month of May and an official tradition began in 1971, the same year during which I had witnessed the death of some young soldiers who served in Special Frontier Force, which is known as Establishment No. 22 in India. Approximately, one million men and women died in defense of the United States since 1775. I cannot give a precise count of the men and women who died serving the cause of Freedom at Special Frontier Force.
The custom of honoring the graves of the war dead began before the close of the Civil War. In 1868, Commander-in-Chief John A. Logan of the Grand Army of the Republic issued a general order designating May 30, 1868 “for the purpose of strewing with flowers or otherwise decorating the graves of comrades who died in defense of their country during the late rebellion.”
Tibetan soldiers with whom I served in Special Frontier Force died in the remote jungles of Chittagong Hill Tracts while our military action code-named ‘Operation Eagle’ initiated Liberation of Bangladesh during November – December 1971. We buried them or cremated them and our fallen comrades have no graves which I can visit for purpose of strewing with flowers or otherwise decorating the sites where they died to defend the cause of Freedom. However, I am pleased to remember them and honor them on this Memorial Day for we fought our battles with weapons, ammunition, field gear, medical supplies, rations, radio sets, and other military supplies provided by the United States. We are partners with India and the United States to defend Tibet and restore its lost Freedom.
On this Memorial Day while I pay my tribute to honor memory of the fallen Tibetan soldiers of Special Frontier Force, I respectfully remind the US and India to renew our pledge to work in support of Peace, Justice, Freedom and Democracy in Occupied Tibet.
Rudra Narasimham Rebbapragada Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162, USA SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE
Special Frontier Force – Tribute to Fallen Soldiers. US President Barack Obama at Arlington National Cemetery.Special Frontier Force – Tribute to Fallen Soldiers. Arlington National Cemetery.
A Tribute to Fallen Soldiers of the US-India-Tibet Military OrganizationA Tribute to Fallen Soldiers of the US-India-Tibet Military OrganizationA Tribute to Fallen Soldiers of the US-India-Tibet Military OrganizationA Tribute to Fallen Soldiers of the US-India-Tibet Military Organization. This trilateral military cooperation began during the presidency of Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Congratulations to Sadhana Forest Mission (U Mission.Org) for planting trees and for transforming 70 acres of barren land of Auroville,Tamil Nadu. Thank You Aviram Rozin for this green transformation.
Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162 USA BHAVANAJAGAT.ORG
This Israeli Man Left His Job, Came To India And Transformed 70 Acres Of Barren Land Into A Forest
It was in 2000, Israeli citizen Aviram Rozin first visited India. Wanting to get lost in the forest and greenery in India, Rozin was pained and shocked to see the rapid deforestation across the country. umission.org Wanting to do something to protect the forests, Rozin along with his wife Yorit and daughter Osher moved to India in 2003. They family bought some 70 acres of barren land in Auroville, Tamil Nadu and started slowly transforming it. umission.org With the help of local volunteers, the planted the barren land with seeds of endangered plant specious and edible plants. umission.org In the next 13 years they transformed the place into a a forest, teeming with life and greenery. auroville auroville Today the ‘Sadhana Forest’ founded by the trio has developed into a bustling eco-friendly settlement with thatched houses, wind pump, solar powered LED lighting, compost toilets and vegan kitchen with energy efficient stoves. Some 18000 indigenous trees have been planted so far on 70 acre mostly eroded land. umission.org Sadhana Forest More than 150 young volunteers from all over the world live in the settlement at any given time planting trees, building bunds and experiencing a simple ecologically conscious life. After tasting success in India, Rozin has taken his Sadhana Forest model to countries like Haiti and Kenya where he get the local community to grow forests. Sadhana Forest Sadhana Forest The mission at first was to plant trees. Now the mission is also to support people in terms of growing food on trees. We are also supporting the learning and transformation of young people that come to volunteer – which are many. Sadhana Forest has evolved into something more than we expected – which is beautiful, said Rozin who calls the volunteers, his family.
SERVE THE NATION – SERVE THE SOLDIER WHO FIGHTS FOR YOUR COUNTRY
SERVE THE NATION – SERVE THE SOLDIER WHO FIGHTS FOR YOUR COUNTRY.
In September 1969, I joined the Indian Army Medical Corps to serve the soldier who fights for my country. I am pleased to share Brigadier Gurmeet Kanwal’s tribute to the Indian Soldier.
The Indian soldier is a role model for the people of India. Scrupulously honest, positively secular, completely apolitical, with an ethos of working hard, simple needs and frugal habits, he is the epitome of courage and unflinching devotion to duty. More than any other group or community in the country, the Indian soldier embodies and represents the idea of India.
In hail, sleet and snow, in icy blizzards and pouring rain, he stands sentinel over the nation’s borders in the high Himalayas. He maintains a silent and lonely vigil along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). He has held the Saltoro Ridgeline west of the Siachen Glacier, the highest battlefield in the world, for almost 30 years and denied the adversary the opportunity to alter the Actual Ground Position Line (AGPL). He has repeatedly shown his mettle while meeting the Chinese challenge along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with Tibet.
From the snow-clad and wind-swept mountains of the Himalayas in the north to the steaming hot and humid jungles of the seven sisters in the north-east and the shimmering sands of the burning Thar Desert in the west, he never lowers his guard. Along the LoC, he braves daily spells of intermittent small arms and mortar fire from a wily enemy. Sometimes he lives through many days of heavy artillery shelling when the very earth around him shakes ominously. Despite the omnipresent danger, hardships, and privations of life on the nation’s troubled frontiers, he stands tall and firm. Stoic and resolute, his courage never wavers, his spirit never flags.
Guardian of the Frontiers
He stopped the rape of Baramulla by Pakistani Razakars in 1947 and saved Srinagar from a similar fate. He took tanks to the 12,000 feet high Zoji La pass in 1948 to push back Pakistani invaders. In a battle that has gone down in military history as the ultimate example of courage under fire, he fought to the last man and last round at Rezang La, near Chushul in Ladakh, in 1962. He stood fast against the Chinese at Walong. He fought off the Chinese despite being ill-clad for a winter in the high Himalayas and being armed with World War II vintage .303 rifles.
He smashed Pakistan’s Patton tanks at Asal Uttar in 1965. He stormed the invincible Haji Pir citadel. At Nathu La in 1967 and at Wangdung in 1986, the glint of his bayonet made the Chinese blink. In 1971, he raced across the Sunderbans to liberate Bangladesh and gave back to the oppressed Bengali people their freedom and their dreams. His naval counterparts sank the Gazi and left Karachi burning. The tiny Gnats of his air force colleagues flew rings around Pakistan’s Sabres and Starfighters that had been gifted by America.
In 1999, his indomitable courage in the face of daunting odds and steadfast devotion to duty triumphed over Pakistan’s regular soldiers entrenched on the mountain tops on the Indian side of the LoC in Kargil district of J&K. As the world watched in awe, he manned his guns unflinchingly under the very nose of the enemy and, firing in the pistol-gun ‘direct fire’ role, he blew every bunker on Tiger Hill and half a dozen other mountain tops to smithereens. He took back every mountain inch-by-bloody-inch. His unparalleled valor inflicted another crushing defeat on the perfidious enemy.
Role in Nation Building
His role in nation building has been outstanding. He spearheaded the effort to integrate Junagadh (1947), Hyderabad (Operation Polo, 1948), Goa (Operation Vijay, 1961) and Sikkim (1975) with the Indian Union. He participated in the interventions in the Maldives and Sri Lanka at the behest of the governments of these countries and was ready to do so in Mauritius. He evacuated beleaguered Indian citizens from some of the world’s most dangerous war zones: Iraq (2003), Lebanon (2006), Egypt, Libya and Yemen (2011), Ukraine and Syria-Iraq (2014) and Yemen (2015).
For many decades in the northeast and since 1989-90 in J&K, he has fought insurgents and mercenary terrorists unleashed by the country’s enemies to destabilize India. He has been ambushed, fired upon with machine guns, made the target of land-mines and has been tortured and killed in cold blood by ruthless Islamist fundamentalists sent to wage a war through terror on India, but has never wilted. He has quelled communal and political riots and police revolts. In all the internal security challenges confronting India, he has never struck back in anger even in the face of the gravest provocations. In fact, while fighting with one hand tied behind his back, he has given a new meaning to the term ‘use of minimum force’.
He is called out regularly for flood relief all over the country. He has removed bodies buried under the rubble of earthquakes at Latur and Dharchula and landslides at Kedar Nath and other places in the Kumaon Hills. He coped with determination in the aftermath of the South East Asian Tsunami in December 2004. He has risked his life in cyclonic storms in Orissa and Andhra Pradesh to bring succor to his suffering countrymen. He has often provided essential services during strikes. He has taken medical aid to remote corners of the country. He has braved epidemics and plagues. He has quelled communal disturbances and riots. He has participated in peace-keeping operations and earned the gratitude of beleaguered people from Korea to the Congo, from Kampuchea to Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Flag Bearer
Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian and belonging to many other faiths, he prays, eats, lives, plays and fights for India together with his brothers in uniform. He is positively secular in that he not only tolerates other religions but also participates in their rituals and observes their customs and gets immense joy from celebrating their festivals. He has evolved the concept of a dharmasthal where the idols of Hindu Gods and Goddesses are installed side by side with the Guru Granth Sahib and soldiers of all religions pray together. On Dussehra, all soldiers participate with folded hands and bowed heads in Shastra Pooja regardless of their religion.
In many remote corners of the country, he is the flag bearer. He represents the government of India. Whenever he goes on leave to his village and when he finally retires, he spreads the message of nationhood and a disciplined way of life in all corners of the country. He has done more to knit India together than all the pompous politicians with their pseudo-national integration programmes and high-sounding slogans.
Often reviled, mostly ignored, sometimes venerated, he has taken it all in his stride. He has never complained. He has stood by the nation through thick and thin. He has held the nation together for 68 turbulent years. In the cesspool of filth, squalor, and corruption in public life, he alone stands apart like is a shining lotus. His life is one of honor, glory, and sacrifice – of life and limb. His blood has sanctified the nation’s battlefields.
For our tomorrow, he willingly, selflessly, unpretentiously, gives his today, but asks for nothing in return. Apolitical by nature, he knows he will get nothing from uncaring politicians and scheming civil servants. If he frets about anything at all, it is about the national leadership’s callousness in failing to erect a befitting war memorial to commemorate the supreme sacrifice made by his fallen comrades. He is troubled that his brothers-in-arms who laid down their lives have remained “unwept, unhonoured and unsung”. But, even here he draws comfort from the famous poem ‘The Bivouac of the Dead’: “On fame’s eternal camping ground, their silent tents are spread; and, glory guards with solemn round, the bivouac of the dead.”
He has truly lived up to Lord Krishna’s exhortation: “Reward is not thy concern.” For him, duty is the most supreme religion – the only one he professes (Seva Parmo Dharma).
He gives so much, gets so little in return, and yet serves with a smile. He is the quintessential Indian who has knit India together. If there is some truth in the phrase “Kuchh Baat hai jo hasti mit-ti Nahin Hamari” (there is something about us that we cannot be destroyed), it is because of his indomitable courage and his immeasurable sacrifices.
(The writer is former Director, Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi.)
Serve the Nation – Serve the Soldier Who Fights for Your Country.
Serve the Nation – Serve the Soldier Who Fights for Your Country. KARGIL WAR.
Serve the Nation – Serve the Soldier Who Fights for Your Country. KARGIL WAR.
Serve the Nation – Serve the Soldier Who Fights for Your Country.
Serve the Nation – Serve the Soldier Who Fights for Your Country.
Serve the Nation. Serve the Soldier who Fights for Your Country.
Camp David Peace Accords of 1978 – The Peace initiative of President Anwar El Sadat
YOM HAZIKARON – REMEMBERING ARAB-ISRAEL CONFLICTS. IN 1971, LIEUTENANT COLONEL B K NARAYAN, REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY, INDIAN ARMY PREDICTED PEACEFUL INTENTIONS OF EGYPTIAN PRESIDENT ANWAR EL SADAT. CAMP DAVID TALKS ON SEPTEMBER 06, 1978.
I have a special reason to remember the Six Day Arab-Israel War of 1967 and Yom Kippur War of October 1973. I served in the Unit named South Column, Hq Establishment No. 22 (Special Frontier Force-Vikas Regiment) during Bangladesh Operations of 1971 when India initiated the Liberation of Bangladesh with military action in the Chittagong Hill Tracts.
A Personal Tribute to Colonel B K Narayan, The Regiment of Artillery, Indian Army.
A Sermon in Kaptai, Bangladesh Ops 1971-72. A personal tribute to Colonel B K Narayan, Islamic Scholar who served in Olive Green Uniform. The Imam of Friday Prayer in Kaptai on December 17, 1971: Glorious Quran, Surah VIII, SPOILS OF WAR, Verse 01: “And if they incline to peace, incline thou also to it, and trust in Allah.Lo! He is the Hearer, the Knower.”
Lieutenant Colonel B K Narayan, the Regiment of Artillery of Indian Army was my Unit Commander. Prior to joining the South Column of Special Frontier Force in October 1971, he served in Egypt as Military attaché at the Indian Embassy in Cairo. He was an expert in Arabic Language and a scholar of Islamic Studies. He memorized Islam’s Holy Book Quran and was able to make a scholarly interpretation of Quran. He served in Cairo during the presidency of Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar El Sadat and had personal friendly relationship with both the Egyptian presidents. In 1971, Lieutenant Colonel Narayan knew President Anwar El Sadat’s mind and predicted that Egypt will sign Peace Treaty with Israel long before the Camp David Talks of 1978. In his conversations, Colonel Narayan described aspects of Islam, and Arab Culture that desire Peace and Reconciliation to resolve conflicts. I am not at all surprised to find President Anwar El Sadat participating in Camp David Talks after waging war against Israel in 1967 and 1973.
Books authored by Colonel B K Narayan (Narayan B K):
Remembering The Six Day Arab-Israel War.Lessons and Consequences of the October War.
1. Lessons and Consequences of the October War. Vikas Publishing House 1977.
Remembering The Six Day Arab-Israel War. Anwar El Sadat A Man with a Mission.
2. Anwar El Sadat: A Man with a Mission. Vikas Publishing House 1977.
3. Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam: A Flame in the Desert. Lancers 1978.
4. An Autobiography General J N Chaudhuri. Advent Books Division 1978.
UNITED WITH ISRAEL (Photo: Jewish Virtual Library)
YOM HAZIKARON – REMEMBERING THE SIX DAY ARAB – ISRAEL WAR. PRESIDENT ANWAR EL SADAT’S PEACE INITIATIVE OF 1978 PREDICTED IN 1971. President Jimmy Carter shaking hands with Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at the signing of the Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty on the grounds of the White House, 1979
Yom Hazikaron: Remembering the Six Day War
In 1967, during the days leading up to the Six Day War, Israel faced a threat to her very existence but miraculously dealt a devastating blow to her enemies.
Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War. President Sadat with U.S. Senator Joe Biden (left), and U.S. Senator Frank Church (center), at Camp David, 1979.
IDF soldiers in the Six Day War
On May 15, 1967, Israel Independence Day, Egyptian forces began to amass along the border. The next day, then-Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser ordered the withdrawal of UN forces from the Israeli-Egyptian border, so that no international observers could impede his assault on the Jewish State.
On May 18, 1967, Nasser declared on Voice of the Arabs radio, “The sole method we should apply against Israel is total war, which will result in the extermination of the Zionist existence.” Other Arab leaders made similar statements. PLO leader Ahmed Al Shuqayri proclaimed, “We shall destroy Israel and its inhabitants. As for the survivors, if there are any, the boats are ready to deport them.” Syrian Defense Minister Hafez Assad asserted, “Our forces are now entirely ready to […] explode the Zionist presence in the Arab homeland. The Syrian army, with its finger on the trigger, is united. I as a military man believe that the time has come for the battle of annihilation.”
As leaders across the Arab world called for the destruction of the world’s Jewish state and the slaughter of her inhabitants, the Straits of Tiran were closed to Israeli shipping, Egypt violated Israeli air space by engaging in aerial spying over the city of Dimona and hostile forces prepared to attack Israel on three different fronts.
YOM HAZIKARON – REMEMBERING THE SIX DAY ARAB-ISRAEL WAR. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, President Jimmy Carter and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at the White House, March 26, 1979.
It was a very scary time in Israel. According to Israeli historian Michael Oren, former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, “Many Israelis feverishly dug trenches and filled sandbags, while others secretly dug 10,000 graves for the presumed victims.Some 14,000 hospital beds were arranged and gas masks distributed to the civilian population. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) prepared to launch a pre-emptive strike to neutralize Egypt, the most powerful Arab state, but the threat of invasion by other Arab armies remained.”
Egypt engaged in six different actions, which according to international law granted Israel the legal right to respond to the Arab aggression by declaring war. These included: conspiring with Syria and Jordan to attack Israel; barring Israeli access to international waterways; violating the 1956 armistice agreements by mobilizing its forces in the Sinai; expelling UN peacekeepers from the Israeli-Egyptian border; flying an illegal spy place over militarily sensitive sites within Israel and amassing Arab troops and tanks along Israel’s borders.
Thus Israel engaged in a preemptive strike. As Oren related, “The Arabs readied to strike — but Israel did not wait. ‘We will suffer many losses, but we have no other choice,’ explained IDF Chief of Staff Yitzhak Rabin. The next morning, on June 5, Israeli jets and tanks launched a surprise attack against Egypt, destroying 204 of its planes in the first half-hour. By the end of the first morning of fighting, the Israeli Air Force had destroyed 286 of Egypt’s 420 combat aircraft, 13 air bases, and 23 radar stations and anti-aircraft sites. It was the most successful single operation in aerial military history.
Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War.
Israel liberated the historic Jewish capital of Jerusalem in the Six Day War.
“But, as feared, other Arab forces attacked,” Oren continued. “Enemy planes struck Israeli cities along the narrow waist, including Hadera, Netanya, Kfar Saba, and the northern suburbs of Tel Aviv; and thousands of artillery shells fired from the West Bank pummeled greater Tel Aviv and West Jerusalem. Ground forces, meanwhile, moved to encircle Jerusalem’s Jewish neighborhoods as they did in 1948.”
As journalist-historian Abraham Rabinovich wrote, “Jerusalem was spread out below in the throes of apocalypse. Every quarter on the Jewish side of the city was being pounded by shellfire. Tracers from machine guns raced toward each other across no-man’s-land, and flares hung suspended on the horizon like Chinese lanterns.”
Six Day War: Israel Defied Her Enemies
Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli foreign minister Moshe Dayan at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in November 1977 (Ya’akov Saar/GPO photo archive). On November 20, 1977, Sadat became the first — and so far only — Arab leader to visit Israel and address the Knesset with a call for peace.
Soldiers who recaptured the Temple Mount in the Six Day War stand in awe.
However, despite extensive Arab efforts to destroy the Jewish state, Israel emerged victorious after only six days of fighting. While 776 Israelis lost their lives the carnage was not as great as expected. Furthermore, Israel managed to reclaim the Jewish heartland of Judea and Samaria as well as to re-unite the Holy City of Jerusalem, thus fulfilling the Zionist dream to establish a Jewish state in the Land of Israel with Jerusalem as its capital. Upon regaining control of the Western Wall and the Dome of the Rock, Israel immediately issued a declaration to the Christian and Muslim residents of the Old City of Jerusalem guaranteeing to protect their right to religious expression, a promise which Israel has kept to this day.
Additional gains in the Six Day War were the acquisition of Gaza, the Golan Heights and the Sinai desert. The territory under Israeli control tripled in size. Israel miraculously defied those who thought the Jewish State would succumb to her enemies’ plans.
On Yom Hazikaron – Israel’s Memorial Day for Fallen Soldiers and Victims of Terror – we remember the heroism of all our fighters.
FILE – In this March 9, 1979 file photo, U.S. President Jimmy Carter waves to crowds in Banha, Egypt, accompanied by President Anwar Sadat during their train trip from Cairo to Alexandria. (AP Photo)Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War. Colonel Anwar El Sadat was a man of Peace and Honor. In 1971, Colonel B K Narayan of Indian Army predicted President Anwar El Sadat’s Peace Initiative of 1978. President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledge applause during joint session of Congress in Washington, D.C., during which President Jimmy Carter announced the results of the Camp David Accords, 18 September 1978Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War. President Anwar El Sadat was a man of Peace and Honor. In 1971, Colonel B K Narayan of Indian Army predicted President Sadat’s Peace Initiative of 1978. Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War. In 1971, Colonel B K Narayan of Indian Army predicted President Anwar El Sadat’s Peace Initiative of 1978.Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War. In 1971, Colonel B K Narayan of Indian Army predicted Peace Initiative of Egyptian President Anwar El Sadat which took shape in 1978. June 20, 1953: First President of the Egyptian Republic General Muhammad Naguib (1st row, 2nd L) poses with members of the Revolutionary Command Council in Cairo, after the proclamation of Egyptian Republic, including Lieutenant Colonel Gamal Abdul Nasser (1st Row, L), Anwar Al Sadat (1sJune 20, 1953, First President of the Egyptian Republic General Muhammad Naguib (1st row, 2nd L) poses with members of the Revolutionary Command Council in Cairo, after the proclamation of Egyptian Republic, including Lieutenant Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser (1st Row, L), Anwar Al Sadat (1st row, R), and armed forces chief General Abdel Hakim Amer (2nd row R). t row, R), and armed forces chief General Abdel Hakim Amer (2nd row R).Yom Hazikaron – Remembering the Six Day Arab-Israel War. In 1971, Colonel B K Narayan of Indian Army predicted President Anwar El Sadat’s Peace Initiative of 1978. Sadat (left) shaking hands with Israeli Defense Minister Ezer Weizman, 1978Jehan Sadat, widow of former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, the first Arab leader to make peace with Israel, died in Egypt on Friday, July 09, 2021. She was 87.
NIXON-KISSINGER TREASON WHILE AIR WAR CONTINUES OVER NORTH VIETNAM
NIXON-KISSINGER TREASON WHILE AIR WAR OVER VIETNAM CONTINUES. NIXON-KISSINGER BEFRIENDED ENEMY GIVING ENEMY COMFORT WHILE US SOLDIERS WERE BLEEDING FIGHTING WAR TO OPPOSE COMMUNISM.
On May 10, 1972, United States continued its air warfare on North Vietnam after Nixon-Kissinger visited Peking in February 1972 providing comfort to Enemy during War. Nixon-Kissinger utterly failed to defend the US military mission; the issue is not that of failed diplomacy, the issue is clearly that of act of treason. I blame Nixon-Kissinger Vietnam Treason for derailing Tibetan Resistance Movement.
President Richard Nixon’s decision to mine North Vietnamese harbors is condemned by the Soviet Union, China, and their Eastern European allies, and receives only lukewarm support from Western Europe. The mining was meant to halt the massive North Vietnamese invasion of South Vietnam that had begun on March 30.
In the continuing air war over North Vietnam, the United States lost at least three planes and the North Vietnamese 10, as 150 to 175 American planes struck targets over Hanoi, Haiphong, and along rail lines leading from China. Lt. Randy Cunningham and Lt. Willie Driscoll, flying a Navy F-4J Phantom from the USS Constellation knocked down three MiGs in one combat mission. Added to two previous victories, this made Cunningham and Driscoll the first American aces of the Vietnam War (and the only U.S. Navy aces of the war).
Also on this day: Air Force Capt. Charles B. DeBellevue of the 555th Tactical Fighter Squadron, flying with Capt. Richard S. Ritchie in a McDonnell Douglas F-4D, records his first aerial kill. Later, DeBellevue recorded four additional victories with pilot Ritchie–both men achieved the designation of ace (traditionally awarded for five enemy aircraft confirmed shot down in aerial combat). In August, DeBellevue, flying with Captain John A. Madden, Jr., shot down two more MiGs, becoming the leading American ace of the Vietnam War.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason while Air War over North Vietnam continued in May 1972. Boeing B-52D Stratofortress.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason while Air War continued over North Vietnam. Bombing of Haiphong Harbor, 17 May 1972.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason while Air War over Vietnam continued in 1972. US aerial bombardment. Binh Long Province. May 1972.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason while Air War over North Vietnam continued in 1972. Bombing Hai Duong road and railway bridge in North Vietnam in 1972.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason during Vietnam War. Nixon-Kissinger befriended Enemy giving comfort to Enemy while US forces waged air warfare in North Vietnam on April 06, 1972.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason while Air War over North Vietnam continued in May 1972. US Navy Screaming Eagles drop four Mk 82 500 Lb bombs over Vietnam.
NIXON-KISSINGER TREASON DURING VIETNAM WAR. NIXON-KISSINGER BEFRIENDED ENEMY WHILE US FORCES WERE CONDUCTING ACTIVE COMBAT MISSIONS.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason while Air War over North Vietnam continued in May 1972. Haiphong Harbor, North Vietnam.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason during Vietnam War. Nixon-Kissinger befriended Enemy while US continued to fight Enemy in North Vietnam. Carrier Saratoga loading in Jacksonville, FL for reported trip to Vietnam in 1972.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason during Vietnam War. In 1972, US and South Vietnam continued their battle against North Vietnam while Nixon-Kissinger befriended Enemy.
Nixon-Kissinger Treason during Vietnam War. In 1972, Nixon-Kissinger visited Peking to befriend Enemy and to give comfort to Enemy.
Whole Dude - Whole Spirituality 